IDA resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa: IDA resource allocation index was 3.14 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.14 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 0.2%
Rank
23rd
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.2 1=low to 6=high
in 2011
All-time low
3.1 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Years of data
21
2005–2025

IDA resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for ida resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa is 3.14 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

The figure is up 0.2% on the previous year and down 1.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa peaked at 3.2 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 3.1 1=low to 6=high, in 2019.

That places Sub-Saharan Africa 23rd out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

IDA resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa, year by year

Annual values for IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.16 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.15 1=low to 6=high -0.1%
2007 3.18 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2008 3.16 1=low to 6=high -0.5%
2009 3.18 1=low to 6=high +0.5%
2010 3.18 1=low to 6=high +0.1%
2011 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.7%
2012 3.17 1=low to 6=high -1.0%
2013 3.17 1=low to 6=high -0.1%
2014 3.19 1=low to 6=high +0.5%
2015 3.17 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2016 3.14 1=low to 6=high -1.1%
2017 3.1 1=low to 6=high -1.1%
2018 3.13 1=low to 6=high +0.9%
2019 3.1 1=low to 6=high -0.9%
2020 3.11 1=low to 6=high +0.3%
2021 3.12 1=low to 6=high +0.2%
2022 3.13 1=low to 6=high +0.4%
2023 3.14 1=low to 6=high +0.4%
2024 3.13 1=low to 6=high -0.3%
2025 3.14 1=low to 6=high +0.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.17 1=low to 6=high 3.15 1=low to 6=high 3.18 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.16 1=low to 6=high 3.1 1=low to 6=high 3.2 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.13 1=low to 6=high 3.11 1=low to 6=high 3.14 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa

  1. 20 Kyrgyzstan 3.64 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 21 Tanzania 3.62 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 23 Fiji 3.57 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 24 Cambodia 3.55 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 25 Burkina Faso 3.53 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 26 Dominica 3.51 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 26 Senegal 3.51 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Sub-Saharan Africa

All data for Sub-Saharan Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is ida resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Ida resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa was 3.14 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
The highest recorded value was 3.2 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
How does Sub-Saharan Africa rank for ida resource allocation index?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/ida-resource-allocation-index-1-low-to-6-high/sub-saharan-africa/">IDA resource allocation index in Sub-Saharan Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).