Cuba vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre

Cuba
1,239 current USD per square kilometre
in 2018
Tanzania, United Republic of
1,068 current USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
128th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
130th

Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
01.0k2.0k3.0k196719952023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,239 current USD per square kilometre against 1,068 current USD per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 171 current USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Cuba ranks 128th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 130th of 166 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current USD per square kilometre 449.95 current USD per square kilometre 449.95 current USD per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0 current USD per square kilometre 288.38 current USD per square kilometre 288.38 current USD per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0 current USD per square kilometre 95.59 current USD per square kilometre 95.59 current USD per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1,046 current USD per square kilometre 180.54 current USD per square kilometre 865.19 current USD per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 1,117 current USD per square kilometre 517.37 current USD per square kilometre 599.44 current USD per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre, Cuba or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Cuba, at 1,239 current USD per square kilometre against 1,068 current USD per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2018.
What is the difference in military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre between Cuba and Tanzania, United Republic of?
171 current USD per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tanzania, United Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2018.
How do Cuba and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 128th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 130th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/military-expenditure-current-usd-per-square-kilometre/cuba/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/military-expenditure-current-usd-per-square-kilometre/cuba/tanzania/">Cuba vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre
Unit
current USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 10,125 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Military expenditure (current USD) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.