Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
661.6 current USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania
34,551 current USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
40th
Lithuania rank
37th

Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
010.0k20.0k30.0k196819952023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 34,551 current USD per square kilometre against 661.6 current USD per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 33,889 current USD per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 52.2 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 40th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 41 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 117.84 current USD per square kilometre 990.93 current USD per square kilometre 873.1 current USD per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 260.68 current USD per square kilometre 4,809 current USD per square kilometre 4,548 current USD per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 414.41 current USD per square kilometre 9,339 current USD per square kilometre 8,925 current USD per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 589.05 current USD per square kilometre 25,469 current USD per square kilometre 24,880 current USD per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 34,551 current USD per square kilometre against 661.6 current USD per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
33,889 current USD per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 40th and Lithuania ranks 37th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/military-expenditure-current-usd-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/military-expenditure-current-usd-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre
Unit
current USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 10,125 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Military expenditure (current USD) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.