South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre

South Africa
2,371 current USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2,250 current USD per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
113th

Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2,371 current USD per square kilometre against 2,250 current USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 121 current USD per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1964 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 166 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 286.31 current USD per square kilometre 59.09 current USD per square kilometre 227.22 current USD per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 1,044 current USD per square kilometre 460.73 current USD per square kilometre 583.13 current USD per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 2,547 current USD per square kilometre 1,014 current USD per square kilometre 1,533 current USD per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 2,627 current USD per square kilometre 780.02 current USD per square kilometre 1,847 current USD per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 2,144 current USD per square kilometre 758.51 current USD per square kilometre 1,386 current USD per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 3,179 current USD per square kilometre 874.34 current USD per square kilometre 2,304 current USD per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 2,627 current USD per square kilometre 1,240 current USD per square kilometre 1,387 current USD per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
South Africa, at 2,371 current USD per square kilometre against 2,250 current USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
121 current USD per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
56 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for military expenditure (current usd), per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/military-expenditure-current-usd-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/military-expenditure-current-usd-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre
Unit
current USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
210 places, 10,125 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Military expenditure (current USD) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.