Austria vs Georgia: Protection of biodiversity and landscape
Austria
134.81 million
in 2022
Georgia
177.80 million
in 2022
Austria rank
52nd
Georgia rank
49th
Protection of biodiversity and landscape over time
- Austria
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 177.80 million against 134.81 million in Austria, a difference of 42.99 million.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 52nd and Georgia ranks 49th of 92 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.26 million | 0 | 24.26 million | Austria |
| 2000s | 51.64 million | 4.62 million | 47.02 million | Austria |
| 2010s | 70.25 million | 48.10 million | 22.15 million | Austria |
| 2020s | 102.86 million | 143.80 million | 40.94 million | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Austria or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 177.80 million against 134.81 million in Austria as of 2022.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Austria and Georgia?
- 42.99 million, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Georgia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Austria and Georgia rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Austria ranks 52nd and Georgia ranks 49th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).