Austria vs Luxembourg: Protection of biodiversity and landscape
Austria
134.81 million
in 2022
Luxembourg
95.19 million
in 2022
Austria rank
52nd
Luxembourg rank
55th
Protection of biodiversity and landscape over time
- Austria
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Austria currently reports 134.81 million against 95.19 million in Luxembourg, a difference of 39.62 million.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.4 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Austria ranks 52nd and Luxembourg ranks 55th of 92 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.31 million | 19.58 million | 732,800 | Austria |
| 2000s | 51.64 million | 28.28 million | 23.36 million | Austria |
| 2010s | 70.25 million | 51.42 million | 18.83 million | Austria |
| 2020s | 102.86 million | 83.71 million | 19.15 million | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Austria or Luxembourg?
- Austria, at 134.81 million against 95.19 million in Luxembourg as of 2022.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Austria and Luxembourg?
- 39.62 million, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Luxembourg?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
- How do Austria and Luxembourg rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Austria ranks 52nd and Luxembourg ranks 55th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).