Croatia vs Luxembourg: Protection of biodiversity and landscape
Croatia
90.94 million
in 2021
Luxembourg
95.19 million
in 2022
Croatia rank
56th
Luxembourg rank
55th
Protection of biodiversity and landscape over time
- Croatia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 95.19 million against 90.94 million in Croatia, a difference of 4.25 million.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 56th and Luxembourg ranks 55th of 92 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.19 million | 19.58 million | 2.39 million | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 25.81 million | 28.28 million | 2.47 million | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 59.53 million | 51.42 million | 8.11 million | Croatia |
| 2020s | 89.55 million | 77.96 million | 11.58 million | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Croatia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 95.19 million against 90.94 million in Croatia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Croatia and Luxembourg?
- 4.25 million, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Luxembourg?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Luxembourg rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Croatia ranks 56th and Luxembourg ranks 55th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).