Croatia vs Slovenia: Protection of biodiversity and landscape
Croatia
90.94 million
in 2021
Slovenia
30.16 million
in 2021
Croatia rank
56th
Slovenia rank
58th
Protection of biodiversity and landscape over time
- Croatia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 90.94 million against 30.16 million in Slovenia, a difference of 60.79 million.
That makes Croatia's figure about 3.0 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Slovenia ahead.
Croatia ranks 56th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 92 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.19 million | 34.03 million | 16.84 million | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 25.81 million | 62.12 million | 36.30 million | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 59.53 million | 31.24 million | 28.30 million | Croatia |
| 2020s | 89.55 million | 26.68 million | 62.86 million | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Croatia or Slovenia?
- Croatia, at 90.94 million against 30.16 million in Slovenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Croatia and Slovenia?
- 60.79 million, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Slovenia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Croatia and Slovenia rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Croatia ranks 56th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).