Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency)
Hong Kong
1.30 billion
in 2021
Netherlands
1.25 billion
in 2022
Hong Kong rank
31st
Netherlands rank
32nd
Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) over time
- Hong Kong
- Netherlands
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 1.30 billion against 1.25 billion in Netherlands, a difference of 49.00 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Netherlands ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 31st and Netherlands ranks 32nd of 92 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 720.71 million | 720.71 million | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 350.00 million | 838.70 million | 488.70 million | Netherlands |
| 2020s | 1.25 billion | 1.09 billion | 162.00 million | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Hong Kong or Netherlands?
- Hong Kong, at 1.30 billion against 1.25 billion in Netherlands as of 2021.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Hong Kong and Netherlands?
- 49.00 million, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Netherlands?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong and Netherlands rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Hong Kong ranks 31st and Netherlands ranks 32nd of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).