Hong Kong, China vs Spain: Protection of biodiversity and landscape
Hong Kong, China
1.30 billion
in 2021
Spain
1.05 billion
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
31st
Spain rank
34th
Protection of biodiversity and landscape over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Spain
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.30 billion against 1.05 billion in Spain, a difference of 246.00 million.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Spain ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and Spain ranks 34th of 92 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 1.59 billion | 1.59 billion | Spain |
| 2010s | 350.00 million | 981.10 million | 631.10 million | Spain |
| 2020s | 1.25 billion | 812.50 million | 437.50 million | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Hong Kong, China or Spain?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1.30 billion against 1.05 billion in Spain as of 2021.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Hong Kong, China and Spain?
- 246.00 million, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Spain?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Spain rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 31st and Spain ranks 34th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).