Hong Kong vs United Arab Emirates: Protection of biodiversity and landscape
Protection of biodiversity and landscape over time
- Hong Kong
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 1.51 billion against 1.30 billion in Hong Kong, a difference of 206.00 million.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 31st and United Arab Emirates ranks 29th of 92 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 700.00 million | 1.44 billion | 738.20 million | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 1.25 billion | 1.04 billion | 205.50 million | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protection of biodiversity and landscape, Hong Kong or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 1.51 billion against 1.30 billion in Hong Kong as of 2022.
- What is the difference in protection of biodiversity and landscape between Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates?
- 206.00 million, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong and United Arab Emirates rank globally for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Hong Kong ranks 31st and United Arab Emirates ranks 29th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).