Barbados vs Nepal: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

Barbados
6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2016
Nepal
6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
62nd
Nepal rank
64th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Nepal
02.0M4.0M6.0M199020062023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 468,190 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 64th of 157 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 5.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 576,166 current LCU per square kilometre 4.67 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 5.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.61 million current LCU per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, Barbados or Nepal?
Barbados, at 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2016.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between Barbados and Nepal?
468,190 current LCU per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Nepal?
14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
How do Barbados and Nepal rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 64th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Nepal: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/barbados/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/barbados/nepal/">Barbados vs Nepal: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.