Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre in Barbados
Barbados: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre was 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2016. ▲ Rising
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre in Barbados, 2003–2016
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Barbados is 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2016. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.7% on the previous year and up 28.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Barbados peaked at 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre, in 2003.
That places Barbados 62nd out of 157 countries with data for 2016, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre in Barbados, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 2004 | 4.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2005 | 4.97 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2006 | 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2007 | 5.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2008 | 6.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2009 | 5.81 million current LCU per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2010 | 5.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2011 | 6.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2012 | 5.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2013 | 5.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2014 | 5.44 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 5.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2016 | 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2010s | 5.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | 5.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | 7 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 59 Kazakhstan 7.32 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 60 Cameroon 7.26 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 61 Thailand 7.02 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 63 Gabon 6.33 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 64 Nepal 6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 65 Seychelles 5.94 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More public sector data for Barbados
- Arms imports 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2009)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 36.48 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2009)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0022 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2009)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2009)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 23,256 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2009)
- Tax revenue 23.4% (2016)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 9.85 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 30.0% (2016)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 132.09 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 4.43 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Barbados?
- Revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Barbados was 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2016, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 6.66 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2003.
- How does Barbados rank for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Barbados ranks 62nd out of 157 countries with data for 2016.
- Is revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Barbados?
- Over the last ten years it is up 28.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Revenue, excluding grants Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.