Chile vs Mauritius: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
78.64 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
17th
Mauritius rank
20th

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M197219972023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre against 78.64 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 8.43 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 17th and Mauritius ranks 20th of 157 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 101,008 current LCU per square kilometre 449,282 current LCU per square kilometre 348,274 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 890,122 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 7.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 223,098 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 20.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 813,040 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 44.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 43.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 77.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 63.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.59 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at 87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre against 78.64 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Mauritius?
8.43 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 17th and Mauritius ranks 20th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/revenue-excluding-grants-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
157 places, 4,552 data points, 1972–2023
Last refreshed

Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.