Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre was 87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 5.7%
World rank
17th
of 157 countries
All-time high
92.36 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
94.15 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1972
Years of data
52
1972–2023
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre in Chile, 1972–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile stood at 87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre.
The figure is down 5.7% on the previous year and up 124.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 92.36 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 94.15 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1972.
Chile ranks 17th of 157 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 94.15 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 430.38 current LCU per square kilometre | +357.1% |
| 1974 | 3,376 current LCU per square kilometre | +684.4% |
| 1975 | 15,238 current LCU per square kilometre | +351.4% |
| 1976 | 50,825 current LCU per square kilometre | +233.5% |
| 1977 | 115,032 current LCU per square kilometre | +126.3% |
| 1978 | 198,364 current LCU per square kilometre | +72.4% |
| 1979 | 323,792 current LCU per square kilometre | +63.2% |
| 1980 | 462,697 current LCU per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1981 | 522,035 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 1982 | 483,611 current LCU per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1983 | 577,030 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1984 | 731,791 current LCU per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1985 | 1.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 1986 | 1.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.6% |
| 1987 | 1.54 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 1988 | 1.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 1989 | 2.15 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1990 | 2.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1991 | 3.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | +40.6% |
| 1992 | 4.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +29.7% |
| 1993 | 5.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1994 | 6.46 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1995 | 7.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1996 | 8.90 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1997 | 9.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1998 | 10.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1999 | 10.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 11.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2001 | 12.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2002 | 13.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2003 | 14.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2004 | 17.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 2005 | 21.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2006 | 26.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 2007 | 31.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2008 | 30.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2009 | 24.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2010 | 32.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 2011 | 37.03 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2012 | 38.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2013 | 38.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 41.21 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2015 | 45.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2016 | 47.42 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2017 | 51.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2018 | 56.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2019 | 57.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 54.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2021 | 77.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | +44.2% |
| 2022 | 92.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 2023 | 87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | -5.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 88,394 current LCU per square kilometre | 94.15 current LCU per square kilometre | 323,792 current LCU per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1980s | 1.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | 462,697 current LCU per square kilometre | 2.15 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 20.46 million current LCU per square kilometre | 11.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | 31.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | 32.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | 57.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 77.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | 54.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | 92.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 14 Uganda 131.23 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 15 Lao People's Democratic Republic 130.89 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 16 Rwanda 130.03 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 18 Equatorial Guinea 80.51 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 19 Armenia 80.37 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 20 Mauritius 78.64 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More public sector data for Chile
- Arms imports 14.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.7083 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 55.56 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 14.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 258.31 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0155 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -6.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 5.11 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 12.12 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile?
- Revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile was 87.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 92.36 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 94.15 current LCU per square kilometre in 1972.
- How does Chile rank for revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 17th out of 157 countries with data for 2023.
- Is revenue, excluding grants (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 124.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Revenue, excluding grants Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.