Australia vs Georgia: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on

Australia
0.9638
in 2020
Georgia
0.9585
in 2020
Australia rank
10th
Georgia rank
11th

Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on over time

  • Australia
  • Georgia
00.20.40.60.81199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.9638 against 0.9585 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0053.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 10th and Georgia ranks 11th of 79 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.964 0.3181 0.6459 Australia
2000s 0.9658 0.5607 0.4051 Australia
2010s 0.962 0.9253 0.0367 Australia
2020s 0.9638 0.9585 0.0053 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher social benefits, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on, Australia or Georgia?
Australia, at 0.9638 against 0.9585 in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in social benefits, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on between Australia and Georgia?
0.0053, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Georgia?
22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
How do Australia and Georgia rank globally for social benefits, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on?
Australia ranks 10th and Georgia ranks 11th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Georgia: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/social-benefits-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to-total/australia/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/social-benefits-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to-total/australia/georgia/">Australia vs Georgia: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
79 places, 1,532 data points, 1972–2020
Last refreshed

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.