How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Kyrgyzstan?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Denmark vs Kyrgyzstan: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on

Denmark

0.1767

in 2020

Kyrgyzstan

0.1658

in 2019

Denmark rank

48th

Kyrgyzstan rank

50th

Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on over time

Denmark
Kyrgyzstan

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.1767 against 0.1658 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0109.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 48th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 50th of 79 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher social benefits, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on, Denmark or Kyrgyzstan?: Denmark, at 0.1767 against 0.1658 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in social benefits, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on between Denmark and Kyrgyzstan?: 0.0109, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Kyrgyzstan?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for social benefits, ratio of this level of government's expenditure on?: Denmark ranks 48th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 50th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Kyrgyzstan: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/social-benefits-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to-total/denmark/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/social-benefits-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to-total/denmark/kyrgyz-republic/">Denmark vs Kyrgyzstan: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Social benefits, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 79 places, 1,532 data points, 1972–2020
Last refreshed: 19 August 2026

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.