Guinea-Bissau vs Micronesia (country): Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Guinea-Bissau
19.92 scale 0-100
in 2024
Micronesia (country)
22.1 scale 0-100
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
171st
Micronesia (country) rank
168th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Micronesia (country)
0102030201520192024

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 22.1 scale 0-100 against 19.92 scale 0-100 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2.18 scale 0-100.

That makes Micronesia (country)'s figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Micronesia (country) ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2010s 18.01 scale 0-100 25.75 scale 0-100 7.74 scale 0-100 Micronesia (country)
2020s 16.01 scale 0-100 23.69 scale 0-100 7.69 scale 0-100 Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Guinea-Bissau or Micronesia (country)?
Micronesia (country), at 22.1 scale 0-100 against 19.92 scale 0-100 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Guinea-Bissau and Micronesia (country)?
2.18 scale 0-100, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Micronesia (country)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Micronesia (country) rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Micronesia (country) ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Micronesia (country): Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/guinea-bissau/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/guinea-bissau/micronesia-fed-sts/">Guinea-Bissau vs Micronesia (country): Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.