Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country)

Micronesia (country): Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score was 22.1 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
22.1 scale 0-100
Change on year
down 0.5%
World rank
170th
of 183 countries
All-time high
28.49 scale 0-100
in 2016
All-time low
22.08 scale 0-100
in 2015
Years of data
10
2015–2024

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country), 2015–2024

01020302015201920242015: 22.1 scale 0-1002016: 28.5 scale 0-1002017: 25.5 scale 0-1002018: 25.5 scale 0-1002019: 27.2 scale 0-1002020: 28.1 scale 0-1002021: 23.9 scale 0-1002022: 22.2 scale 0-1002023: 22.2 scale 0-1002024: 22.1 scale 0-100

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country) stood at 22.1 scale 0-100.

That represents a change of down 0.5% on the previous year and up 0.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country) peaked at 28.49 scale 0-100 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 22.08 scale 0-100, in 2015.

That places Micronesia (country) 170th out of 183 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country), year by year

Annual values for Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100) in Micronesia (country), 2015 to 2024.
Year scale 0-100 Change
2015 22.08 scale 0-100
2016 28.49 scale 0-100 +29.0%
2017 25.47 scale 0-100 -10.6%
2018 25.49 scale 0-100 +0.1%
2019 27.19 scale 0-100 +6.7%
2020 28.07 scale 0-100 +3.2%
2021 23.9 scale 0-100 -14.8%
2022 22.2 scale 0-100 -7.1%
2023 22.2 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2024 22.1 scale 0-100 -0.5%

Micronesia (country) compared with similar countries

  • Micronesia (country)'s 22.1 scale 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 63.66 scale 0-100, 35% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Micronesia (country)'s 22.1 scale 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.39 scale 0-100, 41% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 25.75 scale 0-100 22.08 scale 0-100 28.49 scale 0-100 5
2020s 23.69 scale 0-100 22.1 scale 0-100 28.07 scale 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)

  1. 167 Chad 24.74 scale 0-100 compare
  2. 168 Democratic Republic of Congo 24.35 scale 0-100 compare
  3. 169 Congo 23.85 scale 0-100 compare
  4. 171 Afghanistan 20.68 scale 0-100 compare
  5. 172 Yemen 20.52 scale 0-100 compare
  6. 173 Guinea-Bissau 19.92 scale 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More public sector data for Micronesia (country)

All data for Micronesia (country) →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country)?
Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country) was 22.1 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in Micronesia (country)?
The highest recorded value was 28.49 scale 0-100 in 2016.
What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in Micronesia (country)?
The lowest recorded value was 22.08 scale 0-100 in 2015.
How does Micronesia (country) rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 170th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country). Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/micronesia-fed-sts/">Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Micronesia (country)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,776 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.