Belarus vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Subsidies and other transfers

Belarus
63.8%
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
35.5%
in 2022
Belarus rank
22nd
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
24th

Subsidies and other transfers over time

  • Belarus
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
20406080199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 63.8% against 35.5% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 28.3%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.8 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 22nd and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 152 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 67.6% 25.4% 42.1% Belarus
2010s 68.1% 27.1% 41.1% Belarus
2020s 62.2% 34.5% 27.7% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subsidies and other transfers, Belarus or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
Belarus, at 63.8% against 35.5% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in subsidies and other transfers between Belarus and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
28.3%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
How do Belarus and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for subsidies and other transfers?
Belarus ranks 22nd and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Subsidies and other transfers. Statizoid, drawing on Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/subsidies-and-other-transfers-percent-of-expense/belarus/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/subsidies-and-other-transfers-percent-of-expense/belarus/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Belarus vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Subsidies and other transfers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense)
Unit
% of expense
Source
Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
192 places, 4,500 data points, 1972–2024
Last refreshed

Subsidies are current unrequited payments that government units, including nonresident government units, make to enterprises on the basis of the levels of their production activities or the quantities or values of the goods or services that they produce, sell, export or import. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.