Belgium vs Tanzania: Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense)
Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense) over time
- Belgium
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 54.0% against 53.1% in Belgium, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tanzania ahead.
Belgium ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 152 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.3% | 57.9% | 4.6% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 52.3% | 53.0% | 0.7% | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 54.3% | 59.0% | 4.7% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher subsidies and other transfers, Belgium or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 54.0% against 53.1% in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in subsidies and other transfers between Belgium and Tanzania?
- 0.9%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Tanzania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Belgium and Tanzania rank globally for subsidies and other transfers?
- Belgium ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 40th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Subsidies are current unrequited payments that government units, including nonresident government units, make to enterprises on the basis of the levels of their production activities or the quantities or values of the goods or services that they produce, sell, export or import. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.