Chile vs New Zealand: Subsidies and other transfers
Subsidies and other transfers over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 50.3% against 50.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 45th and New Zealand ranks 44th of 152 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.6% | 36.4% | 17.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 41.7% | 46.2% | 4.5% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 54.9% | 51.0% | 3.9% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher subsidies and other transfers, Chile or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 50.3% against 50.3% in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in subsidies and other transfers between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for subsidies and other transfers?
- Chile ranks 45th and New Zealand ranks 44th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Subsidies are current unrequited payments that government units, including nonresident government units, make to enterprises on the basis of the levels of their production activities or the quantities or values of the goods or services that they produce, sell, export or import. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.