Malaysia vs Zimbabwe: Subsidies and other transfers
Subsidies and other transfers over time
- Malaysia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 44.0% against 43.6% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 152 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.6% | 3.4% | 42.2% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 40.0% | 23.4% | 16.5% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher subsidies and other transfers, Malaysia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 44.0% against 43.6% in Malaysia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in subsidies and other transfers between Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Zimbabwe rank globally for subsidies and other transfers?
- Malaysia ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Subsidies are current unrequited payments that government units, including nonresident government units, make to enterprises on the basis of the levels of their production activities or the quantities or values of the goods or services that they produce, sell, export or import. This indicator is expressed as percentage of total expenses which is any decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction.