Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure
Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.477 against 0.4363 in Belarus, a difference of 0.0407.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 62nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 60th of 75 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.477 against 0.4363 in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0407, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure?
- Belarus ranks 62nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 60th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.