Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure was 0.477 in 2019. ▼ Falling
Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure in Kyrgyzstan, 2014–2019
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 0.477 for subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure in 2019.
That represents a change of down 0.5% on the previous year and down 18.6% over ten years.
That places Kyrgyzstan 60th out of 75 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 0.586 | — |
| 2015 | 0.6132 | +4.7% |
| 2016 | 0.5101 | -16.8% |
| 2017 | 0.441 | -13.5% |
| 2018 | 0.4795 | +8.7% |
| 2019 | 0.477 | -0.5% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 0.477 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.9934, 48% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 0.477 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.7742, 62% of the median. (45 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More public sector data for Kyrgyzstan
- Arms imports 53.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 7.47 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0035 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 278.57 % change on previous year (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 53.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 65.5 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.026 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -2.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 473.05 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 276.33 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure in Kyrgyzstan?
- Subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure in Kyrgyzstan was 0.477 in 2019, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6132 in 2015.
- What is the lowest subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.441 in 2017.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 60th out of 75 countries with data for 2019.
- Is subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 18.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.