CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Armenia
Armenia: CPIA business regulatory environment rating was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▲ Rising
CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Armenia, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2013, cpia business regulatory environment rating in Armenia stood at 4.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of up 12.5% on the previous year and up 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia business regulatory environment rating in Armenia peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 4 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Armenia ranks 2nd of 84 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Armenia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +12.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Armenia
- 1 Georgia 5.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Republic of Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 4 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Armenia
- Arms imports 21.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 6.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0008 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 200 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 21.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 467.45 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0546 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.92 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.42 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 248.23 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia business regulatory environment rating in Armenia?
- Cpia business regulatory environment rating in Armenia was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia business regulatory environment rating recorded in Armenia?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- What is the lowest cpia business regulatory environment rating recorded in Armenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Armenia rank for cpia business regulatory environment rating?
- Armenia ranks 2nd out of 84 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia business regulatory environment rating rising or falling in Armenia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Armenia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Business Regulatory Environment criterion assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environment helps or hinders private business in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive. The emphasis is on direct regulations of business activity and regulation of goods and factor markets. Three sub-components are measured: (a) regulations affecting entry, exit, and competition; (b) regulations of ongoing business operations; and (c) regulations of factor markets (labor and land).