CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: CPIA business regulatory environment rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high.
That represents a change of up 16.7% on the previous year and down 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2019.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 85 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2016 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 12 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Côte d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Mauritania 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kyrgyzstan
- Arms imports 53.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 7.47 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0035 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 278.57 % change on previous year (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 53.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 65.5 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.026 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -2.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 473.05 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 276.33 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan?
- Cpia business regulatory environment rating in Kyrgyzstan was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia business regulatory environment rating recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- What is the lowest cpia business regulatory environment rating recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for cpia business regulatory environment rating?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia business regulatory environment rating rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Business Regulatory Environment criterion assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environment helps or hinders private business in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive. The emphasis is on direct regulations of business activity and regulation of goods and factor markets. Three sub-components are measured: (a) regulations affecting entry, exit, and competition; (b) regulations of ongoing business operations; and (c) regulations of factor markets (labor and land).