CPIA debt policy rating in Angola

Angola: CPIA debt policy rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
42nd
of 84 countries
All-time high
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2007
All-time low
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

CPIA debt policy rating in Angola, 2005–2013

01232005200920132005: 2 1=low to 6=high2006: 2 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2013, cpia debt policy rating in Angola stood at 3 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is up 50.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Angola peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

Angola ranks 42nd of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

CPIA debt policy rating in Angola, year by year

Annual values for CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Angola, 2005 to 2013.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2 1=low to 6=high
2006 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +50.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 4

Countries ranked near Angola

  1. 42 Cape Verde 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 42 Central African Republic 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 42 Dominica 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 42 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 42 Ghana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 42 Kenya 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 42 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 42 Micronesia, Federated States of 3 1=low to 6=high
  9. 42 Mongolia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 42 Myanmar 3 1=low to 6=high
  11. 42 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 42 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 42 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 42 Saint Lucia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 42 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 42 Tajikistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 42 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 42 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 42 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Angola

All data for Angola →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia debt policy rating in Angola?
Cpia debt policy rating in Angola was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Angola?
The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Angola?
The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Angola rank for cpia debt policy rating?
Angola ranks 42nd out of 84 countries with data for 2013.
Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Angola?
Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Angola data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA debt policy rating in Angola. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-debt-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/angola/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-debt-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/angola/">CPIA debt policy rating in Angola</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).