CPIA economic management cluster average in Other small states
Other small states: CPIA economic management cluster average was 2.83 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA economic management cluster average in Other small states, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia economic management cluster average in Other small states is 2.83 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia economic management cluster average in Other small states peaked at 3.39 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.81 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.
Other small states ranks 37th of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 2.81 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Other small states
- 35 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 35 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 35 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 35 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 35 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Ethiopia 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Fiji 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Gambia 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Liberia 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Nepal 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Tonga 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
- 40 Vanuatu 3.33 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Other small states
- Arms imports 104.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 8.29 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0006 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -84.9 % change on previous year (2012)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 104.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 235.91 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0146 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 14.53 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 3.05 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 378.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia economic management cluster average in Other small states?
- Cpia economic management cluster average in Other small states was 2.83 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Other small states?
- The highest recorded value was 3.39 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia economic management cluster average recorded in Other small states?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.81 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
- How does Other small states rank for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Other small states ranks 37th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia economic management cluster average rising or falling in Other small states?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Other small states data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.