CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in IDA blend
IDA blend: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating was 3.45 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in IDA blend, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
IDA blend recorded 3.45 1=low to 6=high for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in 2025.
The figure is down 0.8% on the previous year and down 4.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in IDA blend peaked at 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3.4 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
IDA blend ranks 7th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in IDA blend, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2007 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | +3.9% |
| 2008 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.57 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2011 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.57 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 3.66 1=low to 6=high | -0.3% |
| 2021 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | -2.6% |
| 2022 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2023 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2024 | 3.47 1=low to 6=high | -2.5% |
| 2025 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.51 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.57 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.66 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near IDA blend
- 6 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Côte d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Mauritania 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Mozambique 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Tajikistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Tonga 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Viet Nam 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for IDA blend
- Arms imports 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.62 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -57.84 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 1.10 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 21.19 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0128 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -6.94 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 14.35 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 529.41 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in IDA blend?
- Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in IDA blend was 3.45 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in IDA blend?
- The highest recorded value was 3.67 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in IDA blend?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does IDA blend rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- IDA blend ranks 7th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in IDA blend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this IDA blend data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.