CPIA financial sector rating in Mongolia
Mongolia: CPIA financial sector rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▼ Falling
CPIA financial sector rating in Mongolia, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2019, cpia financial sector rating in Mongolia stood at 2 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.0% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Mongolia peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2009.
That places Mongolia 69th out of 85 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.45 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 69 Bangladesh 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Guinea-Bissau 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Kiribati 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Marshall Islands 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Nicaragua 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Somalia 2 1=low to 6=high
- 69 South Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 69 Tuvalu 2 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Mongolia
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.8737 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -88 % change on previous year (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1.93 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
- Tax revenue 16.9% (2024)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 42,928 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 16.3% (2024)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 96.18 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Mongolia?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Mongolia was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- How does Mongolia rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Mongolia ranks 69th out of 85 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.