CPIA financial sector rating in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: CPIA financial sector rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA financial sector rating in Marshall Islands, 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia financial sector rating in Marshall Islands stood at 2 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia financial sector rating in Marshall Islands peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.
Marshall Islands ranks 68th of 84 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
CPIA financial sector rating in Marshall Islands, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2014 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.11 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
- 68 Bangladesh 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Guinea-Bissau 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Kiribati 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Mongolia 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Nicaragua 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Somalia 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 South Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 68 Tuvalu 2 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Marshall Islands
- Tax revenue 17.2% (2020)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 9.7% (2020)
- Taxes on goods and services 8.4% (2020)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 8.8% (2020)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 5.0% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.4% (2020)
- Grants and other revenue 75.8% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.5% (2020)
- Other taxes 0.8% (2020)
- Compensation of employees 35.3% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia financial sector rating in Marshall Islands?
- Cpia financial sector rating in Marshall Islands was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia financial sector rating recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for cpia financial sector rating?
- Marshall Islands ranks 68th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia financial sector rating rising or falling in Marshall Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.