CPIA fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): CPIA fiscal policy rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2009–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) is 4 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of up 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2024 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2016.
That places Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 7th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2025 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
| 2010s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- 7 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Cameroon 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Dominica 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Ethiopia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Grenada 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Nicaragua 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Rwanda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Tanzania, United Republic of 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Uzbekistan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Arms imports 14.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure 165.56 million current USD (2024)
- Military expenditure 1.5% (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 60 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Intentional homicides 1.89 per 100,000 people (2021)
- Military expenditure 153.05 million current LCU (2024)
- Military expenditure 4.8% (2024)
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved 90.0% (2022)
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with 1,100 number of cases (2023)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score 45.91 scale 0-100 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2016.
- How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 7th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.