CPIA fiscal policy rating in Somalia
Somalia: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Somalia, 2017–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia fiscal policy rating in Somalia stood at 2.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
That represents a change of up 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Somalia peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
That places Somalia 57th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Somalia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.25 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2 |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Somalia
- 57 Comoros 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Ghana 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea-Bissau 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Haiti 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Marshall Islands 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Micronesia (country) 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Pakistan 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Senegal 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sierra Leone 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sri Lanka 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Somalia
- Arms imports 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.2104 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 10.62 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0169 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 43.19 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 201.85 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 6.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Somalia?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Somalia was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Somalia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Somalia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Somalia rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Somalia ranks 57th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Somalia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Somalia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.