CPIA fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands, 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands is 2.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of up 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2018 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Marshall Islands 57th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.11 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
- 57 Comoros 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Ghana 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea-Bissau 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Haiti 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Micronesia (country) 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Pakistan 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Senegal 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sierra Leone 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sri Lanka 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Marshall Islands
- Tax revenue 17.2% (2020)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 9.7% (2020)
- Taxes on goods and services 8.4% (2020)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 8.8% (2020)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 5.0% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.4% (2020)
- Grants and other revenue 75.8% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.5% (2020)
- Other taxes 0.8% (2020)
- Compensation of employees 35.3% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Marshall Islands was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2018.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Marshall Islands ranks 57th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Marshall Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.