CPIA fiscal policy rating in East Timor

East Timor: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
2 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
72nd
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2023
Years of data
20
2006–2025

CPIA fiscal policy rating in East Timor, 2006–2025

012342006201520252006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 2 1=low to 6=high2024: 2 1=low to 6=high2025: 2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia fiscal policy rating in East Timor is 2 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 33.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in East Timor peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.

That places East Timor 72nd out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 20 years of available data.

CPIA fiscal policy rating in East Timor, year by year

Annual values for CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in East Timor, 2006 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2006 3 1=low to 6=high
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high -14.3%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 2.5 1=low to 6=high -16.7%
2019 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 2 1=low to 6=high -20.0%
2024 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.12 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4
2010s 3.15 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 2.25 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near East Timor

  1. 72 Afghanistan 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 72 Central African Republic 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 72 Kiribati 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 72 Mozambique 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 72 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for East Timor

All data for East Timor →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia fiscal policy rating in East Timor?
Cpia fiscal policy rating in East Timor was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in East Timor?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in East Timor?
The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
How does East Timor rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
East Timor ranks 72nd out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in East Timor?
Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this East Timor data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA fiscal policy rating in East Timor. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-fiscal-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-fiscal-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/timor-leste/">CPIA fiscal policy rating in East Timor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.