CPIA gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of

Moldova, Republic of: CPIA gender equality rating was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
4.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 84 countries
All-time high
5 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of, 2005–2019

0123452005201220192005: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 5 1=low to 6=high2007: 5 1=low to 6=high2008: 5 1=low to 6=high2009: 5 1=low to 6=high2010: 5 1=low to 6=high2011: 5 1=low to 6=high2012: 5 1=low to 6=high2013: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 4.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 4.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Moldova, Republic of recorded 4.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia gender equality rating in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is down 10.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of peaked at 5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 4.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Moldova, Republic of 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.9 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 4.65 1=low to 6=high 4.5 1=low to 6=high 5 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Moldova, Republic of

  1. 1 Armenia, Republic of 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 1 Bhutan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 1 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 1 Kyrgyz Republic 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 1 Uzbekistan 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 1 Vietnam 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Moldova, Republic of

All data for Moldova, Republic of →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of?
Cpia gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Moldova, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Moldova, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Moldova, Republic of rank for cpia gender equality rating?
Moldova, Republic of ranks 1st out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Moldova, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is down 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-gender-equality-rating-1-low-to-6-high/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-gender-equality-rating-1-low-to-6-high/moldova/">CPIA gender equality rating in Moldova, Republic of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.