CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high) in Rwanda
Rwanda: CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high) was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA gender equality rating in Rwanda, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia gender equality rating in Rwanda stood at 4.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia gender equality rating in Rwanda peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Rwanda 1st out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high) in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +12.5% |
| 2016 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 4.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for low income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.5× the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 4.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.5× the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
More public sector data for Rwanda
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 37.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.65 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0025 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 117.65 % change on previous year (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia gender equality rating in Rwanda?
- Cpia gender equality rating in Rwanda was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
- What is the lowest cpia gender equality rating recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Rwanda rank for cpia gender equality rating?
- Rwanda ranks 1st out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia gender equality rating rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.