CPIA macroeconomic management rating in High income

High income: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
4 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 14.3%
Rank
4th
of 42 groups
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in High income, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 4 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia macroeconomic management rating in High income is 4 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of up 14.3% on the previous year and up 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in High income peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

High income ranks 4th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in High income, year by year

Annual values for CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in High income, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.5 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 4 1=low to 6=high +14.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.58 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near High income

  1. 1 Kenya 5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 2 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 2 Grenada 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 2 India 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 2 Kosovo 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 2 Mauritania 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 2 Republic of Moldova 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 2 Samoa 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 2 Saint Lucia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 2 Tanzania, United Republic of 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for High income

All data for High income →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in High income?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in High income was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in High income?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in High income?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does High income rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
High income ranks 4th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in High income?
Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this High income data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in High income. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/high-income/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating in High income</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.