CPIA macroeconomic management rating in IBRD only
IBRD only: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▼ Falling
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in IBRD only, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
IBRD only recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2019.
That represents a change of down 1.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in IBRD only peaked at 4.38 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.62 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.
That places IBRD only 4th out of 41 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.2 1=low to 6=high | 4.05 1=low to 6=high | 4.38 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.88 1=low to 6=high | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 1 Kenya 5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Georgia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Grenada 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 India 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Kosovo 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Mauritania 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Republic of Moldova 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Samoa 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Saint Lucia 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Tanzania, United Republic of 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for IBRD only
- Arms imports 11.74 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.36 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -10.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 11.74 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 184.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
- Tax revenue 10.6% (2024)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 21.5% (2024)
- Taxes on goods and services 32.3% (2024)
- Interest payments 10.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in IBRD only?
- Cpia macroeconomic management rating in IBRD only was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 4.38 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.62 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
- How does IBRD only rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- IBRD only ranks 4th out of 41 groups with data for 2019.
- Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.