CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3.85 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) is 3.85 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 1.3% on the previous year and up 5.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 4.06 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3.56 1=low to 6=high, in 2018.
That places Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) 8th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.94 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 3.89 1=low to 6=high | -2.8% |
| 2008 | 3.78 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2009 | 3.78 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | +1.5% |
| 2011 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.72 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2014 | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2015 | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | -1.7% |
| 2019 | 4.06 1=low to 6=high | +14.0% |
| 2020 | 4.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 4.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2024 | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | -2.5% |
| 2025 | 3.85 1=low to 6=high | -1.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.88 1=low to 6=high | 3.78 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.74 1=low to 6=high | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | 4.06 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.99 1=low to 6=high | 3.85 1=low to 6=high | 4.06 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Arms imports 644.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.9954 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 67.27 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 644.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 113.41 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0109 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 10.62 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 73.38 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 19.32 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
All data for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) was 3.85 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 4.06 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.56 1=low to 6=high in 2018.
- How does Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 8th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.