Statizoid

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Low income

Low income: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
3.06 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 1.5%
Rank
35th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.62 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
3.06 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Low income, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Low income stood at 3.06 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of down 1.5% on the previous year and down 5.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Low income peaked at 3.62 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3.06 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.

Low income ranks 35th of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Low income, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.61 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.6 1=low to 6=high -0.1%
2007 3.6 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.58 1=low to 6=high -0.7%
2009 3.62 1=low to 6=high +1.2%
2010 3.62 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.52 1=low to 6=high -2.6%
2012 3.41 1=low to 6=high -3.3%
2013 3.34 1=low to 6=high -2.0%
2014 3.39 1=low to 6=high +1.4%
2015 3.23 1=low to 6=high -4.7%
2016 3.11 1=low to 6=high -3.5%
2017 3.07 1=low to 6=high -1.6%
2018 3.14 1=low to 6=high +2.3%
2019 3.07 1=low to 6=high -2.3%
2020 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.14 1=low to 6=high +2.3%
2022 3.07 1=low to 6=high -2.3%
2023 3.09 1=low to 6=high +0.7%
2024 3.11 1=low to 6=high +0.7%
2025 3.06 1=low to 6=high -1.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.6 1=low to 6=high 3.58 1=low to 6=high 3.62 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.29 1=low to 6=high 3.07 1=low to 6=high 3.62 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.09 1=low to 6=high 3.06 1=low to 6=high 3.14 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Low income

  1. 38 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 38 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 38 Central African Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 38 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 38 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 38 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 38 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 38 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 38 Haiti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 38 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 38 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 38 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 38 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 38 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 38 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 38 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 38 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 38 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Low income

All data for Low income →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Low income?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Low income was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Low income?
The highest recorded value was 3.62 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Low income?
The lowest recorded value was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
How does Low income rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Low income ranks 35th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Low income?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Low income data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Low income. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/low-income/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Low income</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.