CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Other small states

Other small states: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
3.06 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
35th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.58 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.06 1=low to 6=high
in 2024
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Other small states, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Other small states recorded 3.06 1=low to 6=high for cpia macroeconomic management rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is down 10.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Other small states peaked at 3.58 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.06 1=low to 6=high, in 2024.

That places Other small states 35th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Other small states, year by year

Annual values for CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Other small states, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.58 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.36 1=low to 6=high -6.3%
2007 3.36 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.29 1=low to 6=high -2.1%
2009 3.43 1=low to 6=high +4.3%
2010 3.43 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.36 1=low to 6=high -2.1%
2012 3.29 1=low to 6=high -2.1%
2013 3.29 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.43 1=low to 6=high +4.3%
2015 3.43 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.43 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.43 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.43 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.57 1=low to 6=high +4.2%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high -2.0%
2021 3.43 1=low to 6=high -2.0%
2022 3.21 1=low to 6=high -6.2%
2023 3.07 1=low to 6=high -4.4%
2024 3.06 1=low to 6=high -0.3%
2025 3.06 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.4 1=low to 6=high 3.29 1=low to 6=high 3.58 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.41 1=low to 6=high 3.29 1=low to 6=high 3.57 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.22 1=low to 6=high 3.06 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Other small states

  1. 38 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 38 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 38 Central African Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 38 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 38 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 38 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 38 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 38 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 38 Haiti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 38 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 38 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 38 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 38 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 38 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 38 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 38 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 38 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 38 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Other small states

All data for Other small states →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Other small states?
Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Other small states was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Other small states?
The highest recorded value was 3.58 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Other small states?
The lowest recorded value was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
How does Other small states rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
Other small states ranks 35th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Other small states?
Over the last ten years it is down 10.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Other small states data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Other small states. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/other-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-macroeconomic-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/other-small-states/">CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Other small states</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.