CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Yemen
Yemen: CPIA macroeconomic management rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Yemen, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Yemen stood at 2 1=low to 6=high.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 33.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia macroeconomic management rating in Yemen peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 1.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2020.
Yemen ranks 77th of 84 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Yemen, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2018 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | -25.0% |
| 2021 | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +33.3% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.85 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.83 1=low to 6=high | 1.5 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Yemen
More public sector data for Yemen
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.0262 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2018)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 50 % change on previous year (2018)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 56.73 current USD per person (2014)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0397 current USD per US$ of GDP (2014)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 4.01 % change on previous year (2014)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.71 billion current USD (2014)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1.89 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Yemen?
- Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Yemen was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Yemen?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Yemen?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- How does Yemen rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Yemen ranks 77th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Yemen?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Yemen data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.