CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only

IBRD only: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average was 3.85 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
3.85 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
1st
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.88 1=low to 6=high
in 2014
All-time low
3.56 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.6 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.7 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.9 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.9 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.8 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.9 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.9 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

IBRD only recorded 3.85 1=low to 6=high for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in 2019.

That represents a change of up 2.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only peaked at 3.88 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 3.56 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

That places IBRD only 1st out of 42 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only, year by year

Annual values for CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in IBRD only, 2005 to 2019.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.58 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.56 1=low to 6=high -0.5%
2007 3.69 1=low to 6=high +3.5%
2008 3.73 1=low to 6=high +1.1%
2009 3.76 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2010 3.75 1=low to 6=high -0.3%
2011 3.73 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2012 3.74 1=low to 6=high +0.3%
2013 3.72 1=low to 6=high -0.6%
2014 3.88 1=low to 6=high +4.1%
2015 3.85 1=low to 6=high -0.6%
2016 3.8 1=low to 6=high -1.3%
2017 3.8 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.85 1=low to 6=high +1.3%
2019 3.85 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.66 1=low to 6=high 3.56 1=low to 6=high 3.76 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.8 1=low to 6=high 3.72 1=low to 6=high 3.88 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near IBRD only

  1. 1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 2 Bhutan 4.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 2 Georgia 4.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 2 Vietnam 4.1 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for IBRD only

All data for IBRD only →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only?
Cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only was 3.85 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average recorded in IBRD only?
The highest recorded value was 3.88 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
What is the lowest cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average recorded in IBRD only?
The lowest recorded value was 3.56 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does IBRD only rank for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
IBRD only ranks 1st out of 42 groups with data for 2019.
Is cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average rising or falling in IBRD only?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this IBRD only data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policies-for-social-inclusion-equity-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policies-for-social-inclusion-equity-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/ibrd-only/">CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in IBRD only</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,440 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.