CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average was 3.28 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income is 3.28 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 0.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income peaked at 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 3.23 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
Low & middle income ranks 28th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2007 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.6% |
| 2008 | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2009 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | -0.1% |
| 2012 | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2017 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2020 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2022 | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | 3.28 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 28 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Burundi 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Ghana 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Sierra Leone 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.6 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Low & middle income
- Arms imports 11.23 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.67 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -22.65 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 11.23 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 102.29 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0174 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.41 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 687.69 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 186.09 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income?
- Cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average in Low & middle income was 3.28 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 3.33 1=low to 6=high in 2010.
- What is the lowest cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.23 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Low & middle income rank for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Low & middle income ranks 28th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.