CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic stood at 2.5 1=low to 6=high.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2013.
That places Central African Republic 70th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -33.3% |
| 2014 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.33 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
- 70 Angola 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Djibouti 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Nicaragua 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Solomon Islands 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 70 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Central African Republic
- Arms imports 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 8.35 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0168 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -95.45 % change on previous year (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 43.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 13.35 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0259 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 13.83 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 71.17 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 69.02 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Central African Republic was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- How does Central African Republic rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Central African Republic ranks 70th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.