CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.38 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 3.38 1=low to 6=high for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3.1 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 10th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -3.1% |
| 2007 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2010 | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | +1.8% |
| 2011 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -3.0% |
| 2012 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +2.0% |
| 2013 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2019 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +3.0% |
| 2020 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | -4.4% |
| 2021 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +3.8% |
| 2024 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.31 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Arms imports 8.83 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 19.2 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0014 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 13.61 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 8.83 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 657.44 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0492 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 25.48 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 302.41 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 338.22 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 3.38 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 10th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.