CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries

Least developed countries: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.05 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.05 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
33rd
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.07 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
All-time low
2.92 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2007: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2008: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries stood at 3.05 1=low to 6=high.

That represents a change of down 0.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries peaked at 3.07 1=low to 6=high in 2015 and was at its lowest, 2.92 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

Least developed countries ranks 33rd of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries, year by year

Annual values for CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in Least developed countries, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2.97 1=low to 6=high
2006 2.92 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2007 2.95 1=low to 6=high +0.9%
2008 2.95 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 2.95 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +1.7%
2011 3.02 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2012 3.01 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2013 2.97 1=low to 6=high -1.6%
2014 3.04 1=low to 6=high +2.4%
2015 3.07 1=low to 6=high +1.2%
2016 3.02 1=low to 6=high -1.6%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high -0.8%
2018 3.01 1=low to 6=high +0.4%
2019 3.02 1=low to 6=high +0.4%
2020 3.05 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2021 3.02 1=low to 6=high -0.7%
2022 3.03 1=low to 6=high +0.4%
2023 3.02 1=low to 6=high -0.4%
2024 3.05 1=low to 6=high +0.8%
2025 3.05 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.95 1=low to 6=high 2.92 1=low to 6=high 2.97 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.02 1=low to 6=high 2.97 1=low to 6=high 3.07 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.04 1=low to 6=high 3.02 1=low to 6=high 3.05 1=low to 6=high 6

More public sector data for Least developed countries

All data for Least developed countries →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries?
Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries was 3.05 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Least developed countries?
The highest recorded value was 3.07 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Least developed countries?
The lowest recorded value was 2.92 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Least developed countries rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
Least developed countries ranks 33rd out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Least developed countries?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Least developed countries data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Least developed countries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.