CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Republic of Moldova
Republic of Moldova: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▲ Rising
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Republic of Moldova, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Republic of Moldova recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Republic of Moldova peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd of 85 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Republic of Moldova, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova
- 1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 1 Togo 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Bhutan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Côte d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high
- 3 Grenada 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Guinea 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Viet Nam 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 3 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Republic of Moldova
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 46.09 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0061 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 17.34 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 110.73 million current USD (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre 2,866 current USD per square kilometre (2023)
- Tax revenue 18.6% (2023)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 124.55 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 12.4% (2023)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 25.94 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 10.33 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Republic of Moldova?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Republic of Moldova was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2010.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Republic of Moldova rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd out of 85 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.